The arithmetic for one report
Muslim Candidates Ride Democrats’ ‘Blue Tsunami’ Into Power As The Red-Green Alliance Rises
54High density of flagged expressions
What was read
829 words in the outlet's own voice, plus 13 in the headline. 11% of the text is in quotes, with 1 listed word inside quotes. 8 attribution markers (such as "said" or "according to") found.
Listed words inside quotes (not scored; quoting is reporting, but which quotes to use is an editorial choice): terrorists
.
Scare quotes (a phrase of one to three words in quotation marks with no speaker in the same sentence): Blue Tsunami
, inshallah
, alhamdulillah,
, Blind Sheikh
, genocide in Gaza,
. Since method 3.1.0 their words count as the outlet's own.
Words found
- Word choice:
regime
3 points Contentious label
to condemn the Islamic terror regime in Iran and the Iranian Revolutionaryclaimed
1 point Expression of doubt
the United States. Elmi has claimed she is while bragging about usingclaimed
1 point Expression of doubt
about her Marxist beliefs , claimed Israel doesn’t exist, and bragged aboutbragged
2 points Loaded word for "said"
claimed Israel doesn’t exist, and bragged about using the American flag asterrorist
3 points Contentious label
the blame for the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States, andterrorist
3 points Contentious label
headband in support of the terrorist group. In Minnesota, Muslim Democrat candidate - Attribution phrases:
reportedly
2 points Unnamed source
Those voters reportedly listed genocide in Gaza, the Iran
Layer scores
Rates are counted points per 1,000 words of the story's own text. For a story longer than 200 words, the rate used is the average of the whole-story rate and the rate in its densest 200-word stretch, so neutral filler cannot dilute a loaded passage away. Score = 100 × (loaded end − rate used) ÷ loaded end, kept between 0 and 100. Headline words count only in the headline layer.
| Layer | Points | Words | Whole-story rate | Densest 200 words | Rate used | Scale | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Word choice | 13 | 829 | 15.7 | 45.0 (words 451 to 650) | 30.3 | 0 to 40 | 24 |
| Temperature | 0 | 829 | 0.0 | 0.0 (words 1 to 200) | 0.0 | 0 to 40 | 100 |
| Flagged attribution phrases | 2 | 829 | 2.4 | 10.0 (words 551 to 750) | 6.2 | 0 to 20 | 69 |
| Headline wording | 0 | 25 | 0.0 | headline only | 0.0 | 0 to 240 | 100 |
Densest stretch: Word choice, words 451 to 650 of 829, with claimed
, bragged
, terrorist
, terrorist
; Flagged attribution phrases, words 551 to 750 of 829, with reportedly
.
Shown, not scored: the headline's rate minus the rate of the story's first 80 words is 0.0 points per 1,000 words. Experimental: 0 of 4 names and figures in the headline also appear in the text read.
Overall
Weighted geometric mean of the layers that are established, with 10 added to each layer first and taken away at the end: (Word choice 24 + 10)0.4 × (Temperature 100 + 10)0.3 × (Flagged attribution phrases 69 + 10)0.2 × (Headline wording 100 + 10)0.1 − 10 = 54. Adding 10 means one layer at 0 lowers the total steeply without collapsing it. A weak layer pulls the total down.
Lowered the score most: Word choice.
Name-swap test: with party, politician and institution names swapped, this report's score moves by 0.0 points.
What a reader could check
| People named as sources | 0 |
|---|---|
| Unnamed sources | 1 (100% of all sources found) |
| Links to primary records (government, court, filings, PDFs) | 1 muslims.vote |
| Documents cited in the text (a report, bill, ruling, filing) | 2 |
| Checkable specifics (numbers and dates) | 16 |
| Data shown (a table or chart) | no |
| Correction or clarification noted | no |
What a reader could check, counted by published patterns. Shown beside the score, never part of it. How each count works
Checked against the official record
No vote count or bill number found in the text read.
Record of this measurement
Method 3.1.0, word-list fingerprint 807a17189402a416, read by text extractor version 4. Fingerprint of the text read: a4cd9ca03f28ef37. Internet Archive copy nearest the time it was read. The text read was not kept (read before method 3.1.0, or from the feed only), so a later rule change can be applied only while the report is still in the outlet's feed.