Transparency News
Automated assessment. Scores measure selected wording patterns in the outlet's own words. They do not assess factual accuracy, completeness, or which stories an outlet covers. What the score measures

CBS News

The arithmetic for one report

11/6: The Takeout with Major Garrett

CBS News · · headline and summary only (the page text could not be read)

100Few flagged expressions short This report has fewer than 150 words in the outlet's own voice, so it does not count toward the outlet's score.

What was read

20 words in the outlet's own voice, plus 7 in the headline. 0% of the text is in quotes. 0 attribution markers (such as "said" or "according to") found.

Words found

No listed words found.

Layer scores

Rates are counted points per 1,000 words of the story's own text. For a story longer than 200 words, the rate used is the average of the whole-story rate and the rate in its densest 200-word stretch, so neutral filler cannot dilute a loaded passage away. Score = 100 × (loaded end − rate used) ÷ loaded end, kept between 0 and 100. Headline words count only in the headline layer.

LayerPointsWordsWhole-story rateDensest 200 wordsRate usedScaleScore
Word choice0200.0whole story0.00 to 40100
Temperature0200.0whole story0.00 to 40100
Flagged attribution phrases0200.0whole story0.00 to 20not established
Headline wording0250.0headline only0.00 to 240100

Attribution is not established: the story's own text has no attribution and no flagged sourcing phrase, so this layer is left out instead of scoring 100.

Shown, not scored: the headline's rate minus the rate of the story's first 80 words is 0.0 points per 1,000 words. Experimental: 0 of 1 names and figures in the headline also appear in the text read.

Overall

Weighted geometric mean of the layers that are established, with 10 added to each layer first and taken away at the end: (Word choice 100 + 10)0.4 × (Temperature 100 + 10)0.3 × (Flagged attribution phrases left out)0.2 × (Headline wording 100 + 10)0.1 − 10 = 100. Adding 10 means one layer at 0 lowers the total steeply without collapsing it. A weak layer pulls the total down.

Name-swap test: with party, politician and institution names swapped, this report's score moves by 0.0 points.

Only the feed's headline and summary were read, so this report is listed with the headline-and-summary results and never enters the outlet ranking.

What a reader could check

Cites no one. The text read names no source, cites no document and links to no primary record.

People named as sources0
Unnamed sources0
Links to primary records (government, court, filings, PDFs)0
Documents cited in the text (a report, bill, ruling, filing)0
Checkable specifics (numbers and dates)0
Data shown (a table or chart)no
Correction or clarification notedno

What a reader could check, counted by published patterns. Only the headline and summary were read, so most counts will be low. Shown beside the score, never part of it. How each count works

Checked against the official record

No vote count or bill number found in the text read.

Record of this measurement

Method 3.1.0, word-list fingerprint 807a17189402a416, read by text extractor version 4. Fingerprint of the text read: a31c61aac184c471. Internet Archive copy nearest the time it was read. The text read was not kept (read before method 3.1.0, or from the feed only), so a later rule change can be applied only while the report is still in the outlet's feed.

Dispute this result · Report a missed word