Transparency News
Automated assessment. Scores measure selected wording patterns in the outlet's own words. They do not assess factual accuracy, completeness, or which stories an outlet covers. What the score measures

The Guardian

The arithmetic for one report

Obama granted me clemency after 23 years in prison. What will it take for Trump to do similar? | Letter

The Guardian · · full text read

82Moderate density of flagged expressions

What was read

316 words in the outlet's own voice, plus 19 in the headline. 0% of the text is in quotes. 0 attribution markers (such as "said" or "according to") found.

Words found

Layer scores

Rates are counted points per 1,000 words of the story's own text. For a story longer than 200 words, the rate used is the average of the whole-story rate and the rate in its densest 200-word stretch, so neutral filler cannot dilute a loaded passage away. Score = 100 × (loaded end − rate used) ÷ loaded end, kept between 0 and 100. Headline words count only in the headline layer.

LayerPointsWordsWhole-story rateDensest 200 wordsRate usedScaleScore
Word choice03160.00.0 (words 1 to 200)0.00 to 40100
Temperature431612.720.0 (words 1 to 200)16.30 to 4059
Flagged attribution phrases03160.00.0 (words 1 to 200)0.00 to 20not established
Headline wording0250.0headline only0.00 to 240100

Densest stretch: Temperature, words 1 to 200 of 316, with chaos, erupted.

Attribution is not established: the story's own text has no attribution and no flagged sourcing phrase, so this layer is left out instead of scoring 100.

Shown, not scored: the headline's rate minus the rate of the story's first 80 words is 0.0 points per 1,000 words. Experimental: 1 of 1 names and figures in the headline also appear in the text read.

Overall

Weighted geometric mean of the layers that are established, with 10 added to each layer first and taken away at the end: (Word choice 100 + 10)0.4 × (Temperature 59 + 10)0.3 × (Flagged attribution phrases left out)0.2 × (Headline wording 100 + 10)0.1 − 10 = 82. Adding 10 means one layer at 0 lowers the total steeply without collapsing it. A weak layer pulls the total down.

Lowered the score most: Temperature.

Name-swap test: with party, politician and institution names swapped, this report's score moves by 0.0 points.

What a reader could check

Cites no one. The text read names no source, cites no document and links to no primary record.

People named as sources0
Unnamed sources0
Links to primary records (government, court, filings, PDFs)0
Documents cited in the text (a report, bill, ruling, filing)0
Checkable specifics (numbers and dates)6
Data shown (a table or chart)yes
Correction or clarification notedno

What a reader could check, counted by published patterns. Shown beside the score, never part of it. How each count works

Checked against the official record

No vote count or bill number found in the text read.

Record of this measurement

Method 3.1.0, word-list fingerprint 807a17189402a416, read by text extractor version 4. Fingerprint of the text read: 8097a20d18daf2e8. Internet Archive copy nearest the time it was read. The text read was not kept (read before method 3.1.0, or from the feed only), so a later rule change can be applied only while the report is still in the outlet's feed.

Dispute this result · Report a missed word