The arithmetic for one report
Polish Gov't Accused of Lying About Alleged Krakow Mass Shooter's 'Far-Right' Ties After Backtrack
32High density of flagged expressions
What was read
460 words in the outlet's own voice, plus 14 in the headline. 45% of the text is in quotes, with 8 listed words inside quotes. 7 attribution markers (such as "said" or "according to") found.
Listed words inside quotes (not scored; quoting is reporting, but which quotes to use is an editorial choice): far-right
, far-right
, of course
, undoubtedly
, very
, very
, very
, dramatic
.
Scare quotes (a phrase of one to three words in quotation marks with no speaker in the same sentence): Far-Right
, initial hypothesis
, ultra-leftist
, posing with flags
, blatant lie
. Since method 3.1.0 their words count as the outlet's own.
Words found
- In the headline:
far-right
attributed to a speaker, not counted Contentious label
About Alleged Krakow Mass Shooter's Far-Right Ties After Backtrack - Word choice:
claimed
1 point Expression of doubt
the liberal Donald Tusk-led government claimed that initial investigations indicated that thefar-right
attributed to a speaker, not counted Contentious label
shooter was aligned with the far-right was immediately picked up by theextreme right
3 points Contentious label
him being tied to the extreme right online, citing several sources with knowledgefar-left
3 points Contentious label
were no symbols associated with far-left or far-right associations found on hisfar-right
3 points Contentious label
symbols associated with far-left or far-right associations found on his walls. Thefar-right
3 points Contentious label
linking the suspect to the far-right , public broadcaster TVP Info also reportedfar-right
attributed to a speaker, not counted Contentious label
that he was on the far-right , with a former middle school matefar-right
attributed to a speaker, not counted Contentious label
the alleged shooter to the far-right , telling broadcaster TVN24 that he said.far-right
attributed to a speaker, not counted Contentious label
linking the attack to the far-right have sparked criticism, including from opposition
Layer scores
Rates are counted points per 1,000 words of the story's own text. For a story longer than 200 words, the rate used is the average of the whole-story rate and the rate in its densest 200-word stretch, so neutral filler cannot dilute a loaded passage away. Score = 100 × (loaded end − rate used) ÷ loaded end, kept between 0 and 100. Headline words count only in the headline layer.
| Layer | Points | Words | Whole-story rate | Densest 200 words | Rate used | Scale | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Word choice | 13 | 460 | 28.3 | 65.0 (words 51 to 250) | 46.6 | 0 to 40 | 0 |
| Temperature | 0 | 460 | 0.0 | 0.0 (words 1 to 200) | 0.0 | 0 to 40 | 100 |
| Flagged attribution phrases | 0 | 460 | 0.0 | 0.0 (words 1 to 200) | 0.0 | 0 to 20 | 100 |
| Headline wording | 0 | 25 | 0.0 | headline only | 0.0 | 0 to 240 | 100 |
Densest stretch: Word choice, words 51 to 250 of 460, with claimed
, extreme right
, far-left
, far-right
, far-right
.
Shown, not scored: the headline's rate minus the rate of the story's first 80 words is 0.0 points per 1,000 words. Experimental: 1 of 4 names and figures in the headline also appear in the text read.
Overall
Weighted geometric mean of the layers that are established, with 10 added to each layer first and taken away at the end: (Word choice 0 + 10)0.4 × (Temperature 100 + 10)0.3 × (Flagged attribution phrases 100 + 10)0.2 × (Headline wording 100 + 10)0.1 − 10 = 32. Adding 10 means one layer at 0 lowers the total steeply without collapsing it. A weak layer pulls the total down.
Lowered the score most: Word choice.
Name-swap test: with party, politician and institution names swapped, this report's score moves by 0.0 points.
What a reader could check
| People named as sources | 0 |
|---|---|
| Unnamed sources | 0 |
| Links to primary records (government, court, filings, PDFs) | 0 |
| Documents cited in the text (a report, bill, ruling, filing) | 0 |
| Checkable specifics (numbers and dates) | 2 |
| Data shown (a table or chart) | no |
| Correction or clarification noted | no |
What a reader could check, counted by published patterns. Shown beside the score, never part of it. How each count works
Checked against the official record
No vote count or bill number found in the text read.
Record of this measurement
Method 3.1.0, word-list fingerprint 807a17189402a416, read by text extractor version 4. Fingerprint of the text read: 703fcb4fc122ade9. Internet Archive copy nearest the time it was read. The text read was not kept (read before method 3.1.0, or from the feed only), so a later rule change can be applied only while the report is still in the outlet's feed.