The arithmetic for one report
Crypto Industry Sees Its Most Vocal Enemies Claw Back Power
86Few flagged expressions
What was read
1176 words in the outlet's own voice, plus 10 in the headline. 18% of the text is in quotes, with 1 listed word inside quotes. 28 attribution markers (such as "said" or "according to") found.
Listed words inside quotes (not scored; quoting is reporting, but which quotes to use is an editorial choice): huge
.
Scare quotes (a phrase of one to three words in quotation marks with no speaker in the same sentence): crypto army,
. Since method 3.1.0 their words count as the outlet's own.
Words found
- Word choice:
genius
2 points Editorializing
in 2024, Congress passed the GENIUS Act in 2025, a bill regulatingclaimed
1 point Expression of doubt
outlet. The crypto super PAC claimed victory in defeating Nebraska independent Senategenius
attributed to a speaker, not counted Editorializing
holding these digitized dollars. The GENIUS Act, which Trump signed into law - Attribution phrases:
experts say
2 points Vague attribution
on scrutinizing the industry itself, experts say .reportedly
2 points Unnamed source
the Binance cryptocurrency exchange, who reportedly pled guilty to failing to maintain
Layer scores
Rates are counted points per 1,000 words of the story's own text. For a story longer than 200 words, the rate used is the average of the whole-story rate and the rate in its densest 200-word stretch, so neutral filler cannot dilute a loaded passage away. Score = 100 × (loaded end − rate used) ÷ loaded end, kept between 0 and 100. Headline words count only in the headline layer.
| Layer | Points | Words | Whole-story rate | Densest 200 words | Rate used | Scale | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Word choice | 3 | 1176 | 2.6 | 10.0 (words 1 to 200) | 6.3 | 0 to 40 | 84 |
| Temperature | 0 | 1176 | 0.0 | 0.0 (words 1 to 200) | 0.0 | 0 to 40 | 100 |
| Flagged attribution phrases | 4 | 1176 | 3.4 | 10.0 (words 1 to 200) | 6.7 | 0 to 20 | 66 |
| Headline wording | 0 | 25 | 0.0 | headline only | 0.0 | 0 to 240 | 100 |
Densest stretch: Word choice, words 1 to 200 of 1176, with genius
; Flagged attribution phrases, words 1 to 200 of 1176, with experts say
.
Shown, not scored: the headline's rate minus the rate of the story's first 80 words is 0.0 points per 1,000 words. Experimental: 0 of 3 names and figures in the headline also appear in the text read.
Overall
Weighted geometric mean of the layers that are established, with 10 added to each layer first and taken away at the end: (Word choice 84 + 10)0.4 × (Temperature 100 + 10)0.3 × (Flagged attribution phrases 66 + 10)0.2 × (Headline wording 100 + 10)0.1 − 10 = 86. Adding 10 means one layer at 0 lowers the total steeply without collapsing it. A weak layer pulls the total down.
Lowered the score most: Flagged attribution phrases.
Name-swap test: with party, politician and institution names swapped, this report's score moves by 0.0 points.
What a reader could check
| People named as sources | 6 (Ruben Gallego, Stand With Crypto, Mason Lynaugh, Kara Calvert, Geoff Vetter, Stu Alderoty) |
|---|---|
| Unnamed sources | 1 (14% of all sources found) |
| Links to primary records (government, court, filings, PDFs) | 0 |
| Documents cited in the text (a report, bill, ruling, filing) | 2 |
| Checkable specifics (numbers and dates) | 25 |
| Data shown (a table or chart) | no |
| Correction or clarification noted | no |
What a reader could check, counted by published patterns. Shown beside the score, never part of it. How each count works
Checked against the official record
No vote count or bill number found in the text read.
Record of this measurement
Method 3.1.0, word-list fingerprint 807a17189402a416, read by text extractor version 4. Fingerprint of the text read: 601b6be39ab259ae. Internet Archive copy nearest the time it was read. The text read was not kept (read before method 3.1.0, or from the feed only), so a later rule change can be applied only while the report is still in the outlet's feed.